You need a photo scanner if you’re planning on digitalizing your prints, but the question is what photo scanner should you get? Most scanners come equipped with photo-friendly features that enable you to scan high-resolution photographs or to scan slides and negatives. However, only a select few scanners can do so while maintaining a high reproduction standard, especially when it comes to processing multiple photos within a short time span. In order to give you a better idea of what to look for and what is the best photo scanner, we put together a list of the ten best photo scanners the market has to offer at this point. What Is a Photo Scanner? Before we jump into the list of all the best photo scanner devices, lets first discuss what a photo scanner is and how it works. From the very name itself, a photo scanner is used to scan photos.
An image scanning device is usually smaller than other scanners like a document scanner but has a higher resolution. A general scanner machine can scan a 3×5-inch or 4×6-inch image at 300 dpi or image quality of higher resolution. Some of the best photo scanners can even scan negatives.
Choose from the top 10 Photo Scanner Mac Compatibles at today’s lowest prices. Comparaboo top Photo Scanner Mac Compatibles list 2018, Comparaboo analayzed 60,348 consumer reviews. Top-rated Photo Scanner Mac Compatibles at today’s lowest prices. Best Buy customers often prefer the following products when searching for Scanners For Macs. Epson - Perfection V39 Flatbed Color Image Scanner - Black. Epson - Perfection V550 Photo Scanner - Black. Brother - DS-620 Mobile Color Page Scanner - White. Epson - WorkForce DS-30 Portable Document Scanner - Black.
Best Photo Scanners Reviews 2018. 10 Pandigital Photolink PANSCN04 Looking for the best photo printer scanner? First on our list is the fast Pandigital Photolink PANSCN04 5 x 7’ photograph printer whose efficiency is quite unmatched in this price range. This versatile device boasts a handy one-touch exceptional stand-alone design that facilitates direct scanning of photographs directly to your memory card. Better than its predecessors, it eradicates the need of relying on a computer to scan photos and premium payments for classic creations backup. It minimizes image distortion on scanning by its 600dpi resolution which when coupled with its space-efficient compact design and its own memory card (512MB) gives you more than your money worth. 6 Epson Perfection V370 Perfection V370 is a perfectly designed color printer that comes with a resolution of 4800 x 9600 dpi and a subsequent versatile design.
Besides being durable, it allows scanning to cloud and is further equipped with an inbuilt TPU that allows photo enlargement devoid of compromising on quality. With its typical high-rise lid, photos and 3D objects can easily be placed. Moreover, it allows direct access to documents and photos to smartphones and restores faded picture color using its novel photo restorer. 5 Canon Office Products LiDE120 If you frequently do photo scans and need to boost scan quality devoid of digging deep from your pockets, then the LiDE120 is the right choice for you.
With it being internet-enabled, its design allows direct backing up of photos through services like Evernote and Dropbox. Its EX-buttons facilitate easy one-touch operations while its exclusive software My Image Garden make personalization and photo organization a simple task. It boasts a superior photo resolution of 2400 x 4800 dpi, USB convenience, and an automatic placement auto fix provision.
3 Epson Perfection V550 The V550 is a wonderful recommendation for both commercial and personal use. It is a compactly designed color photo high-performance printer that is characterized by a characteristic 6400 dpi resolution that facilitates breathtaking scanning experiences. It comes in a flatbed design that is both easily usable and stable and an ensuing technology (Micro Step drive) that steers its resolution to 12,800dpi breathing life on old pictures during scanning. This flatbed scanner is equipped with a color depth and grayscale of both 16 and 48-bit. Better yet this model offers a large scanning area spanning 8.5 by 11.7 inches and a unique lighting (LED) technology and ReadyScan capabilities. So, if you are asking yourself what type of scanner would be best for restoring old photos? This photo scanning device would be our answer.
2 Doxie Go Plus Scanner An ideal addition to photographers with frequent crafting projects, Doxie Go Plus is a standalone portable document and photo scanner with a high performance and durable design that is unfailing. It is one of the best portable photo scanners around! It allows mobile scanning, a technology that is easy to understand and use. Besides featuring a resolution of 300dpi, it allows you to synchronize all your scans through its exclusive app and comes with a universal power adapter that will prove itself quite useful in the long run. 1 Epson Perfection V600 Scanner Capping off the list is the V600 Espon Perfection.
It is a coded image, photo, and document scanning machine that is accentuated by a perfectly finished stylish design that significantly saves on space. Aside from boasting a 6400x9600dpi resolution, it is characterized by a system (high-powered) that produces large scans (17x 22 inch) and an inbuilt transparency unit not to add digital ice provision which eradicates the tears that can found in virtually every damaged photo. Moreover, it has a one-touch Photo Fix feature that instantly restores added color to any photograph.
What’s more, it allows you to convert your documents scans into test files (editable) through the OCR ABBY FineReader. Best Photo Scanner Apps Looking for a more portable photo scanner? There are apps for your phone that serve as photo scanners as well. We have 5 of them here for you to choose from. This software can be downloaded both on Apple and Android phones. Google Photoscan. Photomyne.
Pic Scanner. Shoebox. Cam Scanner Every app listed here yields scanned digital images that have high resolution. That is one of the main benefits of using a scanning app straight from your phone, and another is that it makes keeping relevant information more accessible. By using a scanning app on your phone, you can easily save business cards, presentation slides and whiteboard text all while turning them into readable documents.
Assuming from your post that you're just looking to scan photos and not negatives, I'm not sure that it matters. The limited dynamic range of prints will be easily handled by any relatively modern scanner and most have more than enough resolution. I have an Epson 3200 that is probably 12 or 13 years old and it's resolution is 3200 dpi (although testing shows that most scanners effective resolution is considerably less than manufacturer's claims). A 3200 dpi scan of an 8 x 10 at 48 bit depth is a humongous file (hundreds/thousands of MBs) and rarely needed. One advantage newer scanners have is the use of LEDs as their light source v fluorescent lights in older units. The use of LED means there's no warm-up time so it's faster from clicking the 'scan' button to actually scanning.
One major thing I would suggest is to make sure your scanner has some sort of dust removal capability (digital ice or other). No matter what anyone says, it is nearly impossible to get your scanner glass and your photos completely dust free. I'm aware of P/S and LR's dust removal tools (amongst others) but it will take you considerably longer than the added scanning time digital ice brings. My 3200 doesn't have this capability but my 4870 does.
The 3200 rarely gets used. Jclin10 wrote: I'm looking to scan a bunch of old photos. What's the best scanner on the market (or previously on the market) for photos? 'Best' can't be said without also stating your budget. The best may be the that were the standard for any respectable printing company. You can't beat those.
Then the Imacon Flextight line. We'll wait while you look up the prices and availability.
But if you only have a tabletop and a couple hundred dollars, you probably want to look at the Epson Perfection line. They are well reviewed and are even OK for film, up to a point. (Beyond that point, try $1000 for a discontinued Nikon Coolscan) Also keep in mind a lot of people get surprisingly great results from. I ran a custom digital photo lab, back in the day. And yes Drum scanners were and are still the best, after that the Flextight is a very very good scanner. I also agree if you can find a used Nikon cool scan on ebay that is also a good choice. If you will be scanning and then posting these images on flicker or google photos or something like that.
I recommend the Epson V600. I scanned thousands of old family negatives and slides and It did a great job for a flatbed. Again my final usage was for viewing on the web. Some family members have made picture books from these scans and are very happy with the results. The epson can come close to a dedicated film scanner for making enlargements, so if that is you need you may want to consider something else. Charles Martorelli wrote: I scanned thousands of old family negatives and slides and It did a great job for a flatbed. Again my final usage was for viewing on the web.
Some family members have made picture books from these scans and are very happy with the results. That is an important point, actually. If most of the viewing is for family photos on the web or in an affordable photo book, there is no need to buy the 'best' scanner. Almost any decent scanner is more than sufficient for web and consumer photobooks. The only needs for the 'best' scanner are commercial print work and high-end fine art prints. Graybalanced wrote.Beyond that point, try $1000 for a discontinued Nikon Coolscan) Graybalanced: I checked eBay for Coolscans and there was quite a variety of prices and models.
I'm interested in scanning a box of old 35mm negs and slides — and doing the same for others (for a fee.) Some of the price gap would be down to newness/lack of dings and scratches; I suspect the biggest reason for price variation would be the model numbers. There must be consumer and prosumers levels. Knowing that I could likely get most of my investment back, once I'm done with it: I'd like to buy the fastest and best model. Can you (or others) recommend the best Coolscans — or series to avoid? Barry Stewart wrote: graybalanced wrote.Beyond that point, try $1000 for a discontinued Nikon Coolscan) Graybalanced: I checked eBay for Coolscans and there was quite a variety of prices and models. I'm interested in scanning a box of old 35mm negs and slides — and doing the same for others (for a fee.) Some of the price gap would be down to newness/lack of dings and scratches; I suspect the biggest reason for price variation would be the model numbers. There must be consumer and prosumers levels.
Knowing that I could likely get most of my investment back, once I'm done with it: I'd like to buy the fastest and best model. Can you (or others) recommend the best Coolscans — or series to avoid? They came out so long ago that my memory is getting fuzzy, but from what I remember, the Super Coolscan V line is more capable than the Coolscan V line. I think the V model was the last version. There was also the LS-50 (less capable) vs LS-5000 (more capable).
If automation is important to you, you might make sure the model you get can take the 35mm filmstrip loader or the bulk slide loader. Mine only came with the filmstrip holder. Some filmstrips, especially 1 or 2 frame ones, are too short to be handled by the autoloader and must be loaded manually with a carrier that looks like the one you'd use with a darkroom enlarger. Nikon might not offer any software that can run the Coolscan on a current operating system.
The Mac version of the Nikon scanning software became incompatible several years ago and wont run on current systems, Windows might be a better situation but I don't know. On Mac or Win it is possible to drive the Coolscan with up to date third party software like Silverfast or Vuescan; that is how I run mine. None of these scanners is very fast if the software is set to high quality. The computer and cable speed are not the bottlenecks, the scanning options are. You can get a quick scan if it's low res 8 bit one pass, but if you want multisampling, dust/scratch removal, 16-bits/channel and so on, you will wait longer for each frame.
Closer to a minute than a few seconds. Check the interface because I think older ones used SCSI, which is a challenge to run on a current Mac/PC when it is even possible. The Coolscan V is USB 2.0, easy hookup. I kinda wonder if the price of the Coolscans could start dropping because everyone is discovering that it can be easier, faster, and higher quality to digitize negs and slides in a fraction of a second with the powerful sensors in today's DSLRs using a macro lens. But my Coolscan still works, so I still use that. Other reasons for price variations is if they were heavily used and components like the stepper motor show signs of failing.
There's a page that has info on what can go wrong with these now very old scanners. I read your 2016 link and did I understand it correctly that one could or should stitch multiple shots of one transparency? I guess I could see that on some formats but that sure seems like it would be a tedious effort.
Not like multiple shots in landscape. I still have my FD extension tubes with slide mount for duplication onto film but Canon changed flange with EOS so i can't use it. I have mostly Nikon D800e with a 60D macro lens with tubes and guessing their might be a bellows to be found. As for larger pieces of film, I shot tons of 67, 69, 6x17 and 5x7. I've used the V750 Epson Pro to get them ready for my website. To get better results with what was recommended on your link he mentioned an upcoming article presenting the actual process of lining up the film for in-camera multi shots. One example sited 20 something shots and called that simple?
It said it would have an article showing the process but I couldn't fine it. If you have a link to that I'd appreciate it. Also good info regarding the compatibility or lack of using older scanners with newer systems. John M Roberts wrote: I read your 2016 link and did I understand it correctly that one could or should stitch multiple shots of one transparency? I'm not sure what that's referring to, unless you mean multi-pass/multi-exposure/multi-sampling.
Scanning applications have those features to try and average out noise or enhance dynamic range. If by 'stitch' you mean merge multiple copies of the same image, the scan application should automatically merge the multiples it makes; VueScan does. Here is the Multi Exposure help text for VueScan, which runs my Nikon scanner: Here is the Multiple Samples help text: Here is the Multiple Pass help text. Graybalanced wrote: John M Roberts wrote: I read your 2016 link and did I understand it correctly that one could or should stitch multiple shots of one transparency?
I'm not sure what that's referring to, unless you mean multi-pass/multi-exposure/multi-sampling. It's not what I mean for I'm not understanding. It's what the author meant by saying 'Let’s cut to the chase: I’m proposing here to use a digital camera of high pixel count – full format / dx format doesn’t really matter – mated with a good macro lens to scan the film using multiple shots, like in a panorama.' Panorama implies sweeping exposures as one would do in the field then stitch. One example showed 1:2 ratio 6 shots and another 1:3 ratio 28 shots. Doesn't make a bit of sense to me. Scanning applications have those features to try and average out noise or enhance dynamic range.
If by 'stitch' you mean merge multiple copies of the same image, the scan application should automatically merge the multiples it makes; VueScan does. No I mean shoot portions of a larger format piece of film and then stitch them together such as I could see doing with a 6x17 transparency from a Fuji G617. Instead of backing off to get the whole length of film to fit the 35mm sensor size you would shoot vertically and pan across overlapping some as you would do with landscape then stitch that in PP. I'll have a look at your links here. Here is the Multi Exposure help text for VueScan, which runs my Nikon scanner: Here is the Multiple Samples help text: Here is the Multiple Pass help text. John M Roberts wrote: It's not what I mean for I'm not understanding. It's what the author meant by saying 'Let’s cut to the chase: I’m proposing here to use a digital camera of high pixel count – full format / dx format doesn’t really matter – mated with a good macro lens to scan the film using multiple shots, like in a panorama.'
Panorama implies sweeping exposures as one would do in the field then stitch. One example showed 1:2 ratio 6 shots and another 1:3 ratio 28 shots. Doesn't make a bit of sense to me. I don't see that wording in any post in this thread, so is it referring to a post in another thread? Anyway, maybe they are talking about taking multiple sections of a single film frame and stitching them together, in order to achieve a very high resolution scan, much higher than if you took a single shot of the entire film frame. I guess it should work. It's not something I have thought about since a lot of my film was consumer grade 35mm shot handheld in mid-range cameras, so I am not sure there is any more actual detail in them than I get from a film scanner.
But I could see the stitching method being useful with medium format film or larger.
Comments are closed.
|
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |